Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2018, the Defendants found in E-cafeteria located in Sinpo City D on January 14:30, 2018, and found in order to comply with it on the grounds that the victim F, an employee of the restaurant, reported the gambling of Defendant B, etc., and Defendant A was on the job of the restaurant operator and the customer, and Defendant A was on the job of “Y, sucking, sucking, su son, son, son of the same year bitch bitch bitch bitch son, n, and n son at this restaurant;

The face from the military floor is also hard to be discarded.

Defendant B’s charge of the indictment “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, am.

It is intended to make the face unfolded from the military floor of the width.

“.....”

Although the victim F was written, the victim F merely stated that Defendant B was “Il, Chewing,” and Defendant A took the main bath.

Since the statement is made, it is corrected and recognized as above.

The noise, such as voice, was satisfy.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to publicly insult the victims and interfered with the employees of the victim's restaurant by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Application of the witness F, G and H’s statutory statement legislation;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult);

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose punishment: Fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act