logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 07. 27. 선고 2017두43203 판결
(심리불속행) 토목공사 등이 실제 이루어졌다고 볼 수 없으며 현장확인이므로 세무조사에 해당안되어 중복세무조사에 해당되지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-81262 (No. 11, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2015-west-783 (2015.06)

Title

(C) If it is impossible to deem that civil engineering works, etc. were actually conducted, it shall not be deemed that such works were conducted, and as such, it shall not constitute a duplicate tax investigation in the tax investigation.

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) It is not deemed that civil works, etc. were actually conducted because it is unclear whether the Plaintiff paid the cost of construction, and that questioning to a third party, etc. at the site of civil works is conducted. As such, it is necessary to conduct a tax investigation and not constituting double tax investigation.

Cases

2017Du43203 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff

The United States of America

Defendant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

July 27, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

Although examining the judgment of the court below in light of the records of this case, it is recognized that the argument on the grounds of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow