logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.02.04 2018구합12980
토지분할측량 성과검사 거부 처분취소 청구
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant sought revocation of the rejection disposition against the Plaintiff on April 5, 2019.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against C to file a claim for ownership transfer registration with the Jungyang-gu District Court Goyang-gu 2012Gadan44320, and on June 26, 2014, “C” filed a final appeal with the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) part (1) of the attached Table 1 among the attached Table 2, (b), (c), (f), (g), (g), (a), and (b) of the attached Table 1 among the land in this case, the part (i) of the ship (hereinafter “part (1) out of the land in this case”), the part (2) of the attached Table 1, (c), (f), (c), and (c) of the attached Table 655 square meters connected each of the said parts (2) part (2) and (32 square meters in sequence with D, each of which was completed on December 23, 2007 (hereinafter “instant judgment”); and (b) each of the said appeal was dismissed.

The filing place shall meet 60% of the building-to-land ratio to the Green Belgium Spanish (Spaneongdong) area.

(b) 53.6% of the building-to-land ratio on a currently site area of 330 square meters, building area of 176.87 square meters, or 70% of the building-to-land ratio on a site area of 264 square meters at the time of division, or on a building area of

c. If the National Land Planning and Utilization Act that does not meet the building-to-land ratio is consistent with the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, the time of application for change of the indication of the building will be attached

(Conditional) On January 4, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Korea Land Information Corporation to conduct a cadastral survey to divide the part of the instant land among the instant land. After conducting a cadastral survey, the Korea Land Information Corporation applied for an inspection of the results of cadastral survey to the Defendant pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Act on the Establishment, Management, etc. of Spatial Data, but the Defendant rejected the examination of the results of cadastral survey on the following grounds on January 17, 2018.

(hereinafter “instant Disposition No. 1”). On April 1, 2019, the Plaintiff, on April 1, 2019, hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) had a site location for the Defendant’s building C owned on the ground of the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”).

arrow