logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.10.13.선고 2016도10105 판결
가.특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)·나.범죄수익은닉의규제및처벌등에관한법률위반
Cases

A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery)

(b) Violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment.

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant and Prosecutor

Defense Counsel

Attorney C,O Q

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 2016No69 decided June 16, 201

Imposition of Judgment

October 13, 2016

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Although examining the Defendant’s grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed, to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed), the lower court did not err by misapprehending the relevant legal principles and evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the duty relationship, consideration, and concealment of criminal proceeds in the crime of bribery, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Meanwhile, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate

2. As to the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the acceptance of bribe regarding KRW 45 million, which was received as the subscription money for convertible bonds and the compensation money for profits from the Defendant among the facts charged against the Defendant, on the ground that there was no proof of crime. In view of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by violating the rules of experience and the rules of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the criteria for determining the acceptance of bribe,

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Lee Ki-taik-taik

Justices Kim Yong-deok

Chief Justice Kim Shin -

Justices Kim Gin-young

arrow