Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 22:40 on January 13, 2014, Defendant A, while drinking friendship B, etc. at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D, the victim D, while drinking friendship B, etc., was the victim and the victim were the victim, and the victim threatened the victim by concluding that the victim would die at a time.

B. Defendant B assaulted the victim’s bridge on a hand at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as paragraph (a).

2. The act of Defendant A is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act; according to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, Defendant B’s act is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against each victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the Defendants on April 18, 2014 after the institution of the instant indictment, it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.