logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.06.11 2014고단1119
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 8, 201, and on June 27, 2012, the same court was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the same court on June 29, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2012, and the said suspended sentence was invalidated. On August 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the same court on August 30,

1. On April 22, 2014, at around 05:10, the Defendant ordered 16,000 won of a sea area, 1,000 won of a market price to F, an employee, at E restaurant operated by the victim D in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving F, was provided by F with the above piracy, etc. in its job.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property owned by the victim.

2. On April 22, 2014, from around 09:00 to around 09:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol from around April 22, 2014 to around 09:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (b) brought a disturbance to the victim F; and (c) prevented the Defendant from entering the said restaurant by having the customers who had her eating at the said restaurant go against the disturbance, such as booming the boom of the boom at the same place as Paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim F's restaurant business by force.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in Paragraph 2, took a bath and booming the eggs, booming the tables, and marked the tables that the Defendant sit.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the table owned by the victim D to be the non-repair of repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions and police suspect interrogation records of the accused;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. 112 accompanying reports;

1. On-site photographs; 1.

arrow