The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is that the Defendant did not interfere with the progress of the council of occupants' representatives or damaged property as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment, nor did the Defendant make a speech that defames D’s reputation.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. A. The summary of the facts charged (1) around 22:00 on November 5, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the progress of the meeting by force of the victim’s disturbance, such as: (a) whether the victim D was dismissed from the chairman of the above apartment management committee; and (b) whether he was found in the above meeting room on the ground that he was dismissed from the office of the chairman of the above apartment management committee; and (c) whether the scars now moved into the meeting; and (d) whether the scars now are wholly illegal.

(2) The Defendant destroyed and damaged property by putting an occupant’s name tag on the date, time, place, and on the books inside the meeting room, and putting the occupant’s name tag on the books of the meeting room. The Defendant destroyed and damaged the victim’s C apartment housing occupant’s market price on the above books where the market price cannot be known.

(3) The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the facts by openly pointing out the following sound, among the 10 residents attending the Emergency Countermeasures Committee’s meetings, “prisoning is 60 million or less,” and “I have to incur bank damages or complete payments.”

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence, such as the witness D, E, and F’s each legal statement, the prosecutor’s protocol of the prosecution against E, the police protocol of D with D, the accusation of D, the victim’s photograph, etc.

C. (1) The records and arguments of this case are shown.