The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the evidence presented by the prosecutor as to the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, although it is sufficient to find the defendant guilty of all the charges of obstruction of business of this case and defamation.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government D apartment (hereinafter "the instant apartment") and the victim E are the occupants of the instant apartment.

1) On July 201, 201, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at the apartment management conference room of the apartment in question, the victim E and the representative F intended to “public hearing” in order to discuss the problems about the apartment management of the instant apartment; (b) obstructed the victims from holding the “public hearing” in the apartment management conference room; and (c) thereby interfered with the victims’ attempt to hold the “public hearing.” On August 25, 2011, the Defendant appeared in the apartment management office of this case around August 25, 2011 at the apartment management office of this case, where the head of the management office G, and “E is complicated and bad; and (d) the Defendant was present at the seat of the head of the management office of the instant apartment management office of this case; and (e) at the seat of the head of the 20-year apartment management office and the head of the 20-year apartment management office to inform the victims of the fact that he publicly disclosed the fact to the 90-year apartment security guards.