logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.04 2020고단2442
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 on May 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft from the victim D’s parking of Oratoba and the delivery of Orababa in front of the Gtel Btel in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (b) caused a theft of satisfaction 17,00 won at the market price managed by the victim when the victim was in custody of Orabababa.

From around that time to March 27, 2020, the Defendant stolen food equivalent to KRW 176,000 by the same method eight times in total, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, between the time and March 27, 2020.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, D, F, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Investigation report (verification of the same kind of power), investigation report (specific the place for committing the crime in this case);

1. The application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV images for suspect moving routes, photographs of each time zone after occurrence, data of each photograph, data of 112 reported case processing, CCTV video images, photographs of vehicle black images, and CCTV photographs and CCTV photographs for crime prevention by capturing them after the occurrence of the crime;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders committed each of the crimes in this case, even though the defendant had been punished for a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victims, and the victim's damage has not been recovered is disadvantageous.

However, the defendant's recognition of each of the crimes of this case and reflects the fact that all of the damaged goods are deemed to have caused a temporary impulse to the pain of delivery, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime shall be determined as ordered by the order, by taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the

arrow