1.(a)

The defendant B press centered on the initial screen of the B press homepage within three days from the date of confirmation of the judgment of this case.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action in G religious organizations (hereinafter “G religious organizations”) H on April 5, 2017, as a person who had been aware of F from November 2006 to November 201, 201, and was subject to disciplinary action in G religious organizations (hereinafter “G religious organizations”).

The defendant newspaper company is an Internet newspaper company that reports general news related to the Buddhist news, and the media is an organization of G religious organizations, and the remaining defendants are the reporters belonging to the defendant newspaper company.

B. Report 1) On June 5, 2017, Defendant newspaper company and Defendant C and D, who are its affiliates, posted articles on the instant website, and major contents related to the instant case (hereinafter “instant first engineer”).

[Is: the plaintiff, hereinafter the same shall apply) is listed as follows:

(J) The article No. 1 of this case provides that “N. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.J.-K’s back transaction will be the old F.S. land (hereinafter “instant land”) in the event that I.S. is known to Seoul F.S.

In addition, the circumstances have revealed that the Defendant attempted to engage in a back transaction with enormous money without the approval process of the end group. If the end is found in the L site that was previously owned by the F company, and the right to develop it is over the Republic of Korea, the F company would be entitled to KRW 50 billion in return for it. The contract entered into between the two parties on July 2, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”) and the terms and conditions of the contract “instant contract.”

) The content was confirmed. This is also a concrete argument that G religious organization H illegally transferred the right to the inspection property “(Iss)” as indicated in the position announced on May 30, to a third party. “The reason for disciplinary action is the same. According to the contract with Isss and K, Fs and K, granted K with its own power of development from the time when securing real rights to the L site and sold the land. In addition, Fs and Is have the condition that Fss and Is and Is and would at the time gain a benefit of at least 50 billion won as compensation (hereinafter “instant first dispute”).

(b)..