logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.12.28 2012고단3373
업무방해등
Text

In two months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant, the first list of crimes in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In the case of E operated by the victim D in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 2006, the Defendant was given the same attitude that he would pay the price even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price. The Defendant ordered the victim to have the right of satisfaction with the contract and received the delivery of 20,000 won of the market price from the victim.

In addition, from around that time to March 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 97,000 from the victims by the same method six times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. Interference with business;

A. The Defendant, around January 2012, in H operated by the victim G in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force by failing to enter the restaurant, by preventing customers who want to enter the restaurant by avoiding disturbance over about twenty (20) minutes of the Defendant’s refusal of access to the restaurant on the ground that the Defendant’s in-takement was made.

B. On June 12, 2012, around 14:40 on June 12, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store operation by force by failing to enter the victim’s convenience store by holding customers who want to enter the victim’s convenience store for about one hour, such as holding in the tables installed in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu Office for Convenience 25 convenience stores and drinking drinking on the tables, taking a bath to customers with convenience stores, and pushing the victims who want to restrain them.

3. On November 201, 201, at around 03:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim with drinking on the face of the victim L(36 years of age) who sent an interrogation by asking for an examination without any particular reason on the roads front of the convenience store of Bawa located in K in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness M, G, N, D, L, andO;

1. Statement of the police statement to J;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (report on previous records of disposition, results of confirmation, and confirmation of the date of release);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow