1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s claim on the principal lawsuit in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below.

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, Plaintiff A claimed wages below the minimum wage guaranteed under the Minimum Wage Act, and Plaintiff B primarily claimed wages below the minimum wage guaranteed under the wage agreement in 2011 and the minimum wage guaranteed under the Minimum Wage Act in advance. Accordingly, the Defendant asserted, as a counterclaim, transport earnings raised retroactively in accordance with the wage agreement in 2011.

The first instance court accepted part of the Plaintiff A’s main claim and the ancillary main claim of Plaintiff B, and dismissed Plaintiff A’s remainder of main claim, Plaintiff B’s main claim, Plaintiff B’s main claim, and the remainder of main claim, and Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiffs.

With respect to this part of the judgment of the first instance, with respect to the part against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the defendant as to the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the defendant as to the plaintiff as to the main claim against the defendant as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the defendant as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff as to the main claim against the plaintiff

2. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in the evidence Nos. 1, 5 through 7, 11, 12, 14, and 15 (including the serial number), either of the parties to the dispute or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings:

The defendant is a corporation that is engaged in taxi transportation business, etc., the plaintiff A is a corporation that is engaged in the plaintiff A from March 19, 2008 to February 2, 2013, and the plaintiff B is 2005.

5. From 23. to December 13, 201, respectively.