logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.11.26 2020고단1094
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

1,900,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Busan District Court on January 7, 2016. On January 31, 2019, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the 1st prison of the Northbukbukbuk Branch, and on January 31, 2019, the Busan District Court was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Dong Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 8

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On February 12, 2018, the Defendant injected psychotropic drugs at the Busan East-gu Birel, Busan-gu, put them into a single-use injection machine, dilution with psychotropic drugs, and then injected them into C. The Defendant also injected psychotropic drugs into a single-use injection machine, dilution with psychotropic drugs, and then injected them into the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C to administer psychotropic drugs.

2. Around December 19, 2018, the Defendant sold approximately 10g of psychotropic drugs to E, after receiving KRW 1.7 million from E, in a passenger car driven by the Defendant, who stopped in the vicinity of an elementary school located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and sold approximately 10g of psychotropic drugs to E.

Accordingly, the Defendant traded psychotropic drugs.

Summary of Evidence

Witness

C Legal Statements

1. Copy of each protocol of suspect examination of C and E by the prosecution;

1. A written investigation report on the F and E’s written statement containing some of the police interrogation records of each police officer’s interrogation protocol (verification ofH association transaction points that have withdrawn funds purchased on a penphone), investigation report (calculated of a surcharge), investigation status (attached to a written judgment with regard to C);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records and investigation reports (E is attached to judgments related to the same kind of power) (E is from this Court to December 19, 2018, and Metecopon (hereinafter referred to as "philopon").

was stated to the effect that the purchase was not well memory.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court.

arrow