logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.12.15 2017고단1152
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the restaurant operated by the Victim C in Daegu-gun Group B on March 14, 2017, the Defendant: (b) took a dispute with one another as a business partner’s obligation relationship while having his employees, business partners, and other business partners; and (c) had the bridge bridges owned by the victim; and (d) damaged the property worth KRW 200,000 in total at the market price by exposing the booms.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, proposed the Defendant, who left the police station E and F police box belonging to the police station that achieved the boom, and, at the same time and place, obstructed the performance of official duties.

Whether it is a dwarf or not to be a dwarf or not

“In doing the bath theory as “,” it was committed by assaulting the above E-E’s upper half of the body with a drinking, cutting the Ba of the said F with a bad hand, cutting the Ba of the said F with a hand, booming the F’s hand on the hand, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning public safety and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and C;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes governing the service of the 112 reported case handling box and the D police box;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the violation of a law, the violation of a fine or a heavier punishment, and the fact that the last punishment has not been imposed after the lapse of a considerable period of time in 2007, and that agreement has been reached with the victim of the crime

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow