A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:35 on December 26, 2016, the Defendant resisted the Victim D’s residence in Daegu-dong-gu, Daegu-gu, for the Defendant on the ground of noise issues; and (b) around the 314-dong, 608 Yoo-gu, the Defendant resisted the Defendant on the ground of noise issues; and (c) “Arhhhh, i.e., g., g., g., l

In order to avoid disturbance, such as walking the door door of the entrance, the body part of the city was damaged by separating the distance from the electrical container, which is owned by the victim of the above apartment corridor, by hand, and then separating the body part of the distance from the body of the body of the body of the victim, which is owned by the victim of the above apartment corridor.

2. On January 10, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 22:30, and around 314:507, E apartment buildings, the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) received a report from D; and (b) sought inquiries about the circumstances of the instant case from the slope G from police officers belonging to the F District Unit of the Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, upon receipt of the said D’s report on the fact that he was going against the disturbance before the said D’s house; (c) “Wners go off, sweet, sweet, and go back, and enter the same even

Gins, Chewing guards, strings, and phos, in accordance with the spirit of the phos.

The appointment, appointment, and identification of a lawyer at Dog-ri-Myeon;

“In addition, the said apartment corridor was put up on the floor of the above apartment, and assaulted, such as putting the design of the said G slope in hand and putting it up in hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch duty of a police officer 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D or G by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged articles, field photographs and field photographs of cases;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. One of the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Suspension of Execution of Official Duties”) is a suspended sentence.