1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that runs the damage insurance business, and is an insurer that has concluded a product damage liability insurance with C. (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”), and the Defendant is a company that manufactures kickboards and supplies them to C.

E은 2018. 4. 경 피고가 제조하고 위 C가 판매하는 D 전동 킥 보드( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 전동 킥 보드’ 라 한다 )를 구입하였고, 2018. 5. 경 부산 F 소재 ‘G’ 라는 상호의 튜닝 �에서 이 사건 전동 킥 보드 발판의 양 옆 2WAY LED 및 방향지시 연동 후방 방향지시 등 밝기 조절 및 전방 라이트를 교체하는 소위 튜닝, 즉 개조를 하였다.

After that, E has resided on March 11, 2019 at around 12:32.

The fire occurred while being charged with the electric kick kick in Jeonju-si, H I, and the fire occurred in the above building I, Jho-ho, Kho-ho and the section for common use, and the fire was destroyed by a fire and resided in the above heading room.

L, etc. has suffered injuries to acute organ infection, etc. due to inhalement, etc.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 95,569,454 as insurance money to the victims of the instant fire accident or the insurance companies that concluded the fire insurance contract with the victims, etc. by January 15, 2020.

전 북지방 경찰청이 작성한 화재현장 조사서에는 ‘ 발화 지점: 이 사건 전동 킥 보드 충전 지점 추정 이 사건 화재 발생 당시 ‘ 쾅’ 하는 소리 또는 터지는 소리를 들었다는 E과 거주 주민의 진술과 이 사건 전동 킥 보드로부터 연소가 진행된 것으로 보이는 연소 방향에 관한 조사 결과 등을 그 근거로 들었다. ,

The cause of fire: It is stated to the effect that it is presumed as the mechanical factors (heating, heating, and load) incurred in filling the kick at the same time.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 through 7, 9 through 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion was made by the defendant.