logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고단903
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 11, 2016, at around 22:30, the Defendant removed a glutinous rice mixture “mix with rice,” which was displayed at the D shop located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, without any justifiable reason, in a blutinous glutinous rice, glutinous rice, glutinous rice, cut off on the floor, and broken off a dog on the floor. Accordingly, the police officers in receipt of the report, who continue to take a bath in the situation of being dispatched, interfered with the victim’s 40 minutes, by force, and interfered with the victim’s store management and the business closing business, an employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the police in relation to the defendant's legal statement E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (related to interference with business);

1. Relevant legal provisions for criminal facts and the grounds for sentencing under Article 314 of the Criminal Act for the selection of punishment [the scope of recommended punishment] shall interfere with the application of the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommended punishment], and the basic area (the period between June and June) (the period between January and June) (the special sentencing person] does not exist;

2. The Defendant, who has already been sentenced to a fine several times due to interference with duties, damage to property, etc., and, in particular, on June 2, 2016, upon being sentenced to a two-year sentence of suspension of execution on June 10, 2015, committed a second offense even though he/she had been sentenced to a two-year sentence of suspension of execution due to a crime of interference with official duties, which became final and conclusive on June 10, 2015, and the victims are punished (the fact that criminal conciliation was attempted at the prosecution investigation stage, but the conciliation was not completed due to

Provided, That the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and that the physical damage appears to have been compensated immediately after the crime, etc.

arrow