logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.02.24 2020나2012774
공사대금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The part excluding the conclusion of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the instant case excluding the conclusion among the reasons for the entry is as follows 2 and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the conjunctive claim added by the plaintiff in this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the attitude of the judgment of paragraph 3. Thus, this part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance in which the plaintiff "1. Basic Facts" was written is all dismissed as "A Co., Ltd."

"Contract Amount: KRW 90,830,00,000: Contract Amount: KRW 91,830,000: KRW 90,830,000,000" at the bottom of the fifth part of the judgment of the first instance.

The following shall be added between 1 and 2 under the 6th page of the judgment of the first instance.

"D."

On January 4, 2021, the Plaintiff’s taking over the Plaintiff’s lawsuit was a corporation established by dividing a construction business sector, etc. from A Co., Ltd., and this court took over the instant lawsuit by taking over the instant lawsuit on January 19, 2021 (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) upon taking over the instant lawsuit on January 19, 2021 (hereinafter “A”) by taking over the Plaintiff’s taking over the Plaintiff’s lawsuit on January 4, 202, “91,930,000,000” as “91,830,000,000.”

Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance 6

(b)be included in the scope of the project set out;

“The following shall be added to the following:

The Plaintiff asserts that construction works under Article 5 (1) 1 and 2 of the terms and conditions of the above contract for construction works should be construed to include only the construction works anticipated at the time of entering into the instant contract or the construction works accompanying the approval of use as a matter of course. However, in full view of the scope of the construction works, the scope of the construction works is stipulated as “all construction works to be inspected including each subparagraph,” and the Plaintiff bears the responsibility for completing the construction of the instant construction works (Article 36 of the terms and conditions of the contract for construction works), it is difficult

The following is added between conduct No. 15 and conduct No. 16 of the first instance judgment. 9:

No. 200,000

arrow