(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.25 2018나2068514

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.25 2018나2068514

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's second preliminary claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. Appeal;

Reasons

The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

Part 3, "attached Form 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, and each point of attached Form 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, and 2" shall be written in attached Form 2, 3, 4, 5, and 2.

Part 3 18 of Part 18 shall be filled by the "on-board cock part" with "on-board cock part".

Part 4, Part 9 "Y" and below "Y" shall be added to "M".

Part 4, " June 26, 1972" in Part 12 shall be applied to " July 18, 1972".

The following shall be added between the 9th page 5 and the 6th page:

Even if the Plaintiff knew that the resale of the certificate of occupancy was permissible, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land constitutes an independent possession solely on such sole basis.

2) The following shall be added between 9 pages 16 and 17 of the Act:

(1) The following:

4.2

As acknowledged in the subsection, it is difficult to view that the contract was already concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the instant land, and it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land constitutes an independent possession.

) The following shall be added between 10 pages 7 and 8 of the Act:

A person shall be appointed.

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made on August 11, 1971 due to the AE case which had been in August 10, 1971, that the defendant would sell the land of Gwangju Complex at KRW 2,000 per square year to not only the residents of the railway site but also to the sellers such as the plaintiff. Accordingly, on November 28, 1973, the plaintiff expressed his intention to purchase the land of this case (i) the land of this case to the defendant on November 28, 1973.

Therefore, as of November 28, 1973, a sales contract for the instant land between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as of November 28, 1973.

Therefore, the defendant is around the land of this case.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-부산고등법원 2016.10.19 2016나52494

-서울고등법원 2019.05.24 2018누68621

-서울고등법원 2021.04.07 2020누32069

-대전고등법원 2019.11.14 2018누13115

-수원고등법원 2020.08.26 2020나69