logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.10 2020나2204
손해배상(기)
Text

Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the designated parties E shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Selection E and G are the children of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Selection F are the Plaintiff’s friendship and the rest of the Selections H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO are the spouses and children of the Selections E and G.

(hereinafter all of them are referred to as the “Plaintiffs.”). The number of separate reservation sites amounted shall be USD 1,552, USD 14,780, Q 80 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant 14th floor”) for Q 1,780 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant 12th floor”). Four persons.

B. Around March 2017, the designated parties E promised to have a lodging from Defendant C as follows for the Plaintiffs’ Busan travel.

However, Defendant C did not have the right to lease the heading of the 14th floor of this case from the beginning.

C. On July 30, 2017, the Plaintiffs were unable to use the instant 14th floor room that the Defendant C and his mother, the Defendant C and the Defendant D, the Plaintiff’s mother, could not use the instant 14th floor room. The Plaintiffs suggested that both of the Plaintiffs were inside the instant 12th floor room, or both of the Plaintiffs were inside the instant 12th floor room, or the instant 12th floor and the 14th floor unit, and that all of the instant 12th floor and the 14th unit reservations were revoked and new accommodation.

Accordingly, the Selection E cancelled the reservation of the 14th floor of the instant case.

The Plaintiff and the Selection F promised to bring about USD 1,318.05 to another hotel in the vicinity, and the remaining 10 persons were paid at the heading room of the 12th floor of this case.

The plaintiffs received USD 1,780 from the accommodation expenses of the 14th floor of this case, and Q plaintiff received damages from S, but it seems that Q is a clerical error in Q Q.

It was paid KRW 1,00,000 as damages for the above accommodation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 3 through 5, 11, 16, 17 each entry (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Defendant C leased the instant 14th floor room to the Plaintiffs due to the Defendants’ nonperformance, but from the beginning.

arrow