A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:55 on April 1, 2014; (b) around 02: (c) around Down-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, lost its utility by walking the front door of the glass door in a number of times, on the ground that he was unable to properly enjoy the secret number of the joint front door, etc.; and (d) on the ground that he became a chemical, the Defendant would not have any more than 10,000 won of the repair cost.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 03:15, 2014, at the Daegu-gu Down-gu Down-gu, Seoul-gu; (b) received 112 reports from the State Dog-gu, that the State Dog-gu had opened the entrance, thereby avoiding disturbance; and (c) received confirmation as to the instant guard from the Assistant F to the Daegu Southern Police Station E

At this time, the Defendant expressed his desire to the above F, stating that “The door inside the door was destroyed and damaged because the door inside the door was inside,” and subsequently, committed assault, such as making the face part of the above F one time by drinking, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

3. On April 1, 2014, around 03:15, the Defendant: (a) was arrested in the act of committing the crime as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above; (b) the police officers arrested in the act of committing the crime and called out to the scene to board the G patrol vehicle; (c) the Defendant resisted the back of the patrol vehicle and the pent part of the said patrol vehicle; and (d) caused approximately KRW 27,093,093 to cover repair costs by taking the back door of the said patrol vehicle and the pent part of the said patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed and damaged patrol cars used by the Daegu Southern Police Station Estation, which is a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Photographss, field photographs, etc. of damaged parts;

1. Application of written estimate of general repair costs to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of causing damage to property and the choice of imprisonment) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the obstruction of performance of official duties.