A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a senior supplier.

1. Violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products;

(a) No person shall falsely indicate the origin of agricultural products;

Nevertheless, on August 1, 2011, the Defendant indicated that approximately KRW 3,000 (1,800 kilograms (1,800 km) in the middle-sea E mixed with approximately KRW 250 km in Korea in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-si, the Defendant received KRW 19,50,000 for the price from G processing factory farming association in the G processing plant F on the same day as the country of origin “domestic origin” and supplied it to the G processing factory partnership in the same day.

(b) No person shall falsely indicate the origin of agricultural products.

Nevertheless, on November 16, 201, the Defendant indicated that the Republic of Korea was mixed with approximately KRW 600 km in China in the above case E, and then supplied KRW 32,985,000 (2,100) to the above G processing plant farming association corporation for the above day on the same day.

(c) No person shall falsely indicate the origin of agricultural products.

Nevertheless, on November 19, 201, the Defendant, on the same day, indicated that the 1,050 (630km) was a mixture of approximately 325 km in China in the above E, and supplied KRW 7,665,000 to the above G processing plant farming association corporation on the same day as the country of origin.

Accordingly, the Defendant indicated the origin of agricultural products in a total of three times as above.

2. Fraud;

A. On August 1, 2011, the Defendant presented to the victim a certificate of origin indicating the origin as “domestic origin”, as described in paragraph (a) above, even though the G processing factory farming association operated by the victim H in Naju-si on August 1, 201, in which the Defendant was mixed with the high-in domestic production that the Defendant intended to sell, the Defendant presented to the victim the certificate of origin indicating the origin as “domestic origin” and said false statement to the effect that 100% of domestic production

Accordingly, the Defendant received 19,500,000 won from the victim as the price for domestic bankruptcy.

B. On November 16, 201, the Defendant attempted to sell to the victim at the above G processing factory partnership.