Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months on December 2, 2016, with prison labor for the crime of acquiring stolen goods at the Suwon Friwon, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 2016.

[Criminal facts] The defendants are friendly, and the defendant A is between the victim D (n, 18 years of age) and his/her woman-friendly Gu.

1. On November 29, 2016, the Defendant, at around 05:25, brought a dispute with B in front of the F main office in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and brought an injury to the victim, such as a light seat, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, while continuing to dispute with B while moving the same to a male toilet in the first floor of the above building, was delayed after combining it with B, and the victim was faced with the main body, and the victim was able to keep the head debt of the victim’s head from the victim’s head from the victim’s head from the victim’s head, was shakend, and the victim’s face, chest and body body can be taken into consideration in drinking, and the victim suffered approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. On November 29, 2016, the Defendant 2: (a) on the first floor of the building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the first floor of which was reported by the police officers, such as paragraph (1) and 112, to witness the above A to arrest him/her as the current offender; and (b) went to A; (c) he/she was removed from H to the police officer belonging to the G police box in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Police Station, where he/she heard the damage statement from the above D; and (d) he/she took a bath to “I will see why I would see h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h? h. h.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported crimes and suppression of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The witness H’s legal statement (Defendant B asserts that there was no use of violence against the victimized police officer, such as the statement in the facts charged.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., H., the victimized police officer.