1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 13, 2015, the Plaintiff driven a BNAS car owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “victim”) and was in the atmosphere of signaling at the location of D Industrial Complex located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a FNAS car under the influence of alcohol level 0.219%; (b) driven a vehicle under the influence of blood alcohol level 0.219%; and (c) driven a vehicle with the rear driver of the vehicle under the influence of the parked.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with E (hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”).

C. The terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract stipulate as follows with respect to the loss of automobile price decline (hereinafter “accident damage”).

District Court Decision 201Na1100

6. Where the repair cost of a motor vehicle (limited to a motor vehicle which is two years or less after its departure) due to an accident causing a fluctuation in the market price of a motor vehicle exceeds 20% of the value of the motor vehicle immediately preceding its release, 15% of the repair cost shall be paid for the motor vehicle which is not more than one year after its release, and 10% of the repair cost shall be paid for the motor vehicle which is more than one year but not more than two

The Defendant paid KRW 7,196,700 in total as damages for substitute property related to the instant accident.

(e)the repair content of the damaged vehicle shall be members of the opportune, the opportune floor, the opportune floor, and the respective opportune of opportune and opportune, and the exchange of the opportune.

F. On January 21, 2014, the damaged vehicle first registered and passed one year and seven months after the delivery of the instant accident at the time of the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1, 2 (including paper numbers), Eul 1, and 2; the court's entrustment of appraisal to FE fire-specific motor vehicle damage adjusting companies; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion was repaired due to the instant accident, but the damaged vehicle completely recovers its function and value before the accident.