1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around 2007, the Plaintiff was a public official of Grade 8 in the function of driving school buses of Annexed Kindergartens to E Elementary Schools (hereinafter “instant kindergarten”). Defendant B and C were the parents of F who had the instant kindergarten, and Defendant D was the department of G who had the instant kindergarten.

B. On August 30, 2007, Defendant B and C filed a complaint with the Gangwon Provincial Police Agency on the Plaintiff’s indecent act against children, intimidation, etc. The above complaint stating that “F had an interest in any point different from that of ordinary behavior, expressed that he had expressed a bath on August 17, 2008, and made a horse operator talked with his body, and that the bus operator continued to have his body (important part) by taking a threat, such as making an electrical adviser if he talks about this talk, and that the bus operator continued to have his body (important part).”

C. On October 29, 2007, Defendant D filed a complaint with the Gangwon Provincial Police Agency on the Plaintiff, and the above complaint states that “the Plaintiff was panty to put the Plaintiff in a panty and acted in a manner that meets the sound of G and friendly ties.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accusation”) Defendant B, C, and D filed a complaint with the Plaintiff. D

With respect to the above accusation, the Gangwon Provincial Police Agency conducted three times from August 30, 2007 to November 13, 2007 the interrogation of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff consistently denied the above accusation.

E. The Gangwon Provincial Police Agency requested the Supreme Prosecutors' Office to conduct a false speech detection machine to the plaintiffs, and on December 7, 2007, the scientific investigation officer in the office of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office requested the plaintiff to conduct a primary inspection of psychological physiological (hereinafter "first inspection") on the plaintiff, and on December 11, 2007, a psychological physiological inspection (hereinafter "second inspection") was conducted respectively.

The above psychological officers are asked the plaintiff about the case, and "I am am l', F, in panty, in panty (33).