1. On December 8, 2014, the Defendant’s “protruding machine escape certificate” against the Plaintiff on December 8, 2014.

1. On October 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for medical care benefits for “the 4-5th and 5th to the 100th century,” and on December 8, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-approval of the medical care benefits for “the 4-5th to the 4-5th to the 4-5th to the Plaintiff as a result of the MRI verification, and there is no opinion on the MF pressure on the 5th to the 4-5th to the 4-5th to the end, and the 4-5th to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end of the 1st to the end

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On October 8, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that he worked in a restaurant “B restaurant”, and that roassing on October 8, 2014, around 01:00, he had a strong pains on the floor by moving roass to the storage line from the Rapan to the lapan, and going beyond the floor.

The plaintiff's inferred escape certificate constitutes occupational accidents, and thus, the disposition of this case is unlawful.

B. In full view of the statement Nos. 5 and 8 of the judgment, the results of physical examination on the innate Hospital of the Republic of Korea University of 1,000 by this court, and the overall purport of the arguments, the disposition of this case, which is the ground for the disposition that the Plaintiff’s “propin escape certificate” exists in the RoI on October 21, 2014, is unlawful, on the grounds that there is no “4-5 pages and 5 pages-1,00” under the RoI on the RoI taken by C Hospital.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.