logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.06.09 2017고정160
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a notary public C office located in Yongsan-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) around March 2, 2016, the Defendant provided the victim D with three copies of interest on a loan of KRW 2 million; and (c) provided the victim with payment after a month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, on March 2014, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the damaged party due to the obligation incurred while returning the investment amount of KRW 70 million to the Defendant, who made an investment in the bread house operated by the Defendant.

The defendant acquired 2 million won from the damaged person as the borrowed money.

2. On March 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a notary public’s office located in Yongsan-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) at a notary public’s office located in Yongsan-gu, Changwon-si; (c) provided the victim D with three copies of interest on a loan of three million won; and (d) provided the victim with a full payment after a month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, on March 2014, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the damaged party due to the obligation incurred while returning the investment amount of KRW 70 million to the Defendant, who made an investment in the bread house operated by the Defendant.

The defendant obtained 3 million won from the damaged person as the borrowed money and acquired it by fraud.

3. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant would have D pay the victim F after one week if he/she had D pay the victim F.

“The term “ makes it false.”

However, on March 2014, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money borrowed from the damaged party due to the obligation incurred while returning the investment amount of KRW 70 million to the Defendant, who made an investment in the bread house operated by the Defendant.

The defendant received 2 million won from the damaged person as the borrowed money from G and acquired it by transfer to the criminal account in the name of G.

arrow