logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.03.07 2016고단1236
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 12, 2013, the Defendant against the victim C is expected to pay the principal to the victim C in the street near the E Hospital located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, with the amount of KRW 10 million,00,000,000,000 to the victim C after 2 to 3 months. Thus, the Defendant would pay the money in installments with the amount of KRW 50,000,000,000.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he would use the money borrowed from the victim as gambling money, and there was no property or monthly income under the name of the defendant, and there was a circumstance that he had been able to repay the money borrowed from F with the money borrowed from F in advance of gambling, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to repay the money within the due date for which he promised to borrow money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and i.e., he obtained 10 million won from the victim for the loan from the victim, i.e., the victim.

2. On September 30, 2014, the Defendant against the Victim G was found to have the victim’s land of about 1,500 square meters inside the south of the Gyeongwon-si, Changwon-si in the mutual infrancdong-dong, Changwon-si and the victim’s three-story buildings in Msan.

The credit card value is paid by January 9, 2015 when the credit card is paid with money required.

‘False speech' was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use the money borrowed from the victim as money for gambling, and there was no property or monthly income under the name of the Defendant, and there was no circumstances under which he was able to repay the money borrowed from another person before the sale of gambling, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, there was no intention or ability to repay the money within the time limit which he promised to pay the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and that is to say, from the victim, the victim is 10 million won as the borrowed money.

arrow