1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on April 27, 2016 as bereaved family benefits and funeral site pay shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. 원고가 이 사건 소를 제기한 배경(☞ 다툼 없는 사실)

A. The Plaintiff’s husband, B (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s husband”) entered the Korea Rural Community Corporation on August 1, 1997 and promoted to Grade IV around February 2001, and committed suicide with knife in the house on July 20, 201, while he was in charge of design duties as the director of the C project team D division from January 20, 2014.

B. Since the Board of Audit and Inspection commenced on June 22, 2015 (the first audit schedule: the first audit schedule of the party: July 17, 2015) with respect to illegal matters surrounding the execution of personnel expenses for daily workers of the Korea Rural Community Corporation, the Board of Audit and Inspection was included in the subject matter of investigation on the Aggravated high-ranking (E) and made an audit of the auditor on July 17, 2015, and later requested the Supreme Prosecutors' Office to investigate E according to the audit results.

C. On July 20, 2015, at around 08:35, 2015, the deceased reported the crypology that he had received to the former North Korean Community Corporation as the headquarters of the former North Korean Community Corporation. At around 08:57, the deceased cryp 3 soldiers without going to work as the office, and immediately returned home at around 09:35, and dyp dyp dyp styp syp syp syp syp syp syp syp syp syp syp sypher

Then, on November 3, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim for survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses with the Defendant on the ground that “(a deceased person who faithfully performs his/her responsibility and works in D division, who is the challenge department, is unable to check his/her psychological failure during the actual audit process of the Board of Audit and Inspection, and voluntarily cut away, and thus constitutes occupational death.” The Defendant filed a claim for survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on April 26, 2016, on the ground that “the deceased person’s suicide cannot be deemed to be a death due to occupational cause” with the Plaintiff on the ground that “the deceased person’s suicide cannot be deemed to be a death due to occupational cause.”