1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

From July 30, 1970 to February 28, 1977, B, who is the husband of the Plaintiff, retired from the office of the Plaintiff, who was working as a fluoral acid in the Dong-dong Mining Center in the case of the case of this case, for six years from six years to six years.

B In the precise diagnosis conducted around April 2003, the first pneumoconiosis diagnosis and the subsequent determination of grade 13 have been conducted on a regular basis.

B, on August 5, 2013, after the outbreak of low blood pressure shock and heart shock caused by blood transfusions from the corrosion and the eurtic eurical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical eurgical e

(2) On November 4, 2013, the Plaintiff claimed payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant by asserting that the deceased died due to pneumoconiosis and its combination. However, on November 4, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the deceased’s death is difficult to be recognized due to pneumoconiosis and its combination.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the purport of the entire statement and pleading as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, and the Plaintiff’s death led to the Plaintiff’s occurrence of hearts in the state where the blood transfusions generated from the food and the pulmonary disorder caused by the pneumoconiosis and the repulmonary disorder, were not completely normalized differently from the general public, and eventually, the occurrence of the pulmon

Therefore, there is a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and pneumoconiosis. Therefore, the Defendant’s disposition rejecting the Plaintiff’s survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on a different premise is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Judgment

㈎ 산업재해보상보험법 제5조 제1호의 업무상의 재해라 함은 근로자가 업무수행 중 그 업무에 기인하여 발생한 재해를 말하므로 업무와 재해 사이에 인과관계가...