logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2014.02.04 2013가단13148
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuits against the defendant C and D are all dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The registration of ownership transfer was completed on January 29, 2010 with respect to the instant real estate No. 1, each of the instant real estate. As to the shares of 69.837/6782.6 shares among the instant real estate No. 1 (hereinafter “share of 1”) on May 20, 2011, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 13, 2011.

(2) The registration of ownership preservation of the instant real estate No. 2 was completed in the future of king Construction Co., Ltd., and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 20, 201 in the future as of May 13, 2011.

(3) As to the instant real estate shares and the instant real estate shares and the instant real estate No. 129054 on December 1, 201, the ownership transfer registration was completed due to the purchase and sale as of November 15, 201.

(4) As to the instant real estate No. 3, registration of initial ownership was completed in the future of king Construction Co., Ltd., the registration of initial ownership was completed. Of the instant real estate No. 1, the registration was completed due to Defendant C, C, and D’s registration and the contract establishing a contract on May 6, 201, as the receipt of the same registration No. 48629, May 6, 201, with respect to the entire shares and three real estate in king Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the maximum amount of debt KRW 1,40,000,000.

(hereinafter “instant collateral security”). B.

Around October 2011, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against E, etc. to revoke a fraudulent act, etc. under this Court 201Kahap7436. On May 13, 2011, the Plaintiff sought to revoke the registration of transfer of ownership as to each of the above real estate due to the cancellation of the sales contract concluded on May 13, 2011 and restitution of the original state.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 17, 19, 22, 23, Eul evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. As to the claim against the defendant B, the plaintiff is the debtor.

arrow