Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 18, 2014, around 23:40 on March 18, 2014, the Defendant was employed in front of the D District of the Suwon-gu Police Station D District of the Suwon-gu Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and was employed as a taxi engineer in name and a Si guard and went off from the taxi.

The defendant's male-friendly arrest E requested that the defendant under the influence of alcohol be escorted to the defendant's house during the night hours, and G, a slope F belonging to the above patrol unit, and a policeman belonging to the same patrol group, had the defendant embarked on the patrol vehicle.

Around 00:10 on March 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was demanded by the said G to verify his residence; (b) stated that “I would be why I would be why I would be why you have a fluor, and why I would be why I would have a fluor,” and (c) stated that “I would be why I would be why I would be why I would have a fluor,” and that the said G was seated with his hand at one time, with his hand, and assaulted the G’s face and brush with his hand, and thereby interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and security; and (d) at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on G, such as cluoral fluoral fluor, and fluoral fluoral sium, which require two weeks of treatment.”

2. On March 19, 2014, at around 00:15, the Defendant: (a) was waiting to be arrested as a flagrant offender due to interference with the performance of official duties as above; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the management and maintenance of order of the suspect arrested by the police officer on one occasion on his/her hand, who was demanded by the police officer to sit in the suspect’s seat at the seat of the police officer, while waiting to be arrested as a flagrant offender; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G and H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The defendant who is selected to impose a fine for selective punishment has committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol and has depthed the current mistake;