logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.20 2018고정436
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On November 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the Victim E (FF) who provided volunteer service at the facility while hearing D et al. at the senior apartment house management center of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on November 15:0, 2017; (b) whether the young young young people have provided such match service; (c)

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as “the person who raises and raises low amounts of KRW 50,000,000 per month, KRW 60,000 per year, and KRW 60,000 per year.”

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 312(2) of the same Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to the court on April 16, 2018, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted, and submitted the written withdrawal of complaint to the court and withdrawn the wish to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow