logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2017.09.20 2017가단544
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) 4,800,000 won and from February 1, 2017.

Reasons

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, either of the parties to a dispute or of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3.

The Plaintiff is the owner of the real estate listed in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).

B. On June 24, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement stating that the instant real estate is KRW 10 million, KRW 800,000 per month, and KRW 100,000 per month, and period of lease from August 1, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and delivered the instant real estate to the Defendant on August 1, 2016.

C. Notwithstanding the instant lease agreement, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff rent at all, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 1,604,650 as of February 2, 2017.

The Plaintiff expressed his intent to terminate the instant lease agreement to the Defendant prior to the filing of the instant lawsuit.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the instant lease contract was terminated as the Defendant’s delinquency in payment, the Defendant, the lessee, and the lessor, is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, the lessor, and to pay the lessee the overdue rent of KRW 4.8 million ( KRW 8 million x 6 months) from August 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017, and the rent or rent of KRW 800,000,000 calculated at the rate of KRW 80,000 per month from February 1, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate, and to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 1.5% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from March 3, 2017 to the completion date of delivery.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow