1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the second floor of 202 square meters, No. 105 square meters, among the buildings listed in the attached list;

B. June 26, 2017

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiffs, on March 7, 2016, leased the lease deposit of KRW 10 million and KRW 800,000 per month of rent (excluding value-added tax) to the defendant on March 7, 2016, by setting the lease deposit of KRW 202,000,000 among the buildings listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The defendant does not pay a rent from June 26, 2017. Accordingly, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiffs' duplicate of the complaint, which contains a declaration that the lease contract will be terminated on the ground of the foregoing delinquency, reaches the defendant on June 12, 2018.

2. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant, a lessee, is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the lessor and pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 80,000 per month from June 26, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate as unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that some of the overdue rent claimed by the plaintiff was paid, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant has paid the overdue rent.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.