logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.12 2014가합1149
임금 등
Text

1. The defendant shall calculate the amount claimed by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selector according to the annexed Form 2.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective entries in Gap's 1 to 6, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 30 through 34, 37, 39, 43, 46, Eul's 2, 3, and 9 (including various numbers) and the whole purport of the pleadings.

The parties concerned are companies running passenger transport business, etc. at Jeonju City, and the plaintiffs (the appointed parties; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiffs, etc.") and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiffs, etc.") are workers employed by the defendant and providing labor (the designated parties Nos. 1, 10, 12, and 14 of the annexed table Nos. 2 through No. 14 among the appointed parties are city bus drivers, bus drivers (the designated parties No. 1, 10, 12, and 14 of the annexed table Nos. 1, 10, 12, and 14 of the cross-city bus operation route are the maintenance party), the remaining designated parties are the National Democratic Trade Union Federation of Korea (the Democratic Labor Union of Korea).

B. Collective bargaining and industrial action from around 2010 1), Jeollabuk-do is an industrial union consisting of workers engaged in the land transport business or any incidental business related thereto from before the instant union, and is affiliated with the National Motor Vehicle Workers' Union under the Korean Motor Vehicle Workers' Union Federation affiliated with the Korean Motor Vehicle Workers' Union Federation (hereinafter referred to as the "Korean Motor Vehicle Union").

2) A bus company (the Defendant, citizen passenger, limited partnership company, passenger, day passenger, limited company, day passenger, and day prior to the limited company; hereinafter collectively referred to as “bus company”) in the former North Korean region including the Defendant entered into a collective agreement with the former North Korean Automobile Labor Union around June 2010, and employees employed by the Defendant at that time were subscribed to the former North Korean Automobile Labor Union.

3..

arrow