1. On April 4, 2012, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced in accordance with the C public-private partnership project implementation plan as of April 4, 201, D, Gyeongbuk-gun.

1. The Plaintiff is the owner of 1,537 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) prior to the Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

E is the mother of the Defendant, and was divided into 1134m2, 18m2, 18m3,000,000,000 m2,000,000,000 m2,000,000,000 square meters adjacent to the instant real property;

G The land was divided into 11 October 201, 2012 into 188 square meters in P field.

H was divided into 2231 square meters before October 11, 2012, which was 1349 square meters prior to H:

I, on October 16, 2012, was divided into Qu 1983 square meters in Qu 1983 square meters;

J is the owner of 724 square meters prior to K, 411 square meters prior to K, and L 496 square meters (hereinafter “each adjoining real estate of this case”).

The instant real estate and each of the instant adjoining real estate were incorporated on April 4, 2012 into the M Business (M Project) Act, and determined as a road zone by C public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs’s approval of a private investment project implementation plan.

On January 29, 2014, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs issued a request for consultation with respect to the amount of farming compensation on April 7, 2014, following the appraisal procedure. On April 23, 2014, the Busan Regional Land Management Office calculated the amount of farming compensation for the instant real estate pursuant to Article 48(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”), and the calculated amount is KRW 6,278,640.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 7 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) leased and cultivated the instant real estate and each adjoining real estate of this case from E.

The Defendant did not cultivate the instant real estate, and did not have resided in the instant house located on the ground (hereinafter “instant house”) located in the Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, the same area as the location of the instant real estate. Since February 1, 2011, the Defendant resided in the Daegu Northern-gu R.

Therefore, this is applicable.