1. The Defendant: (a) 2,616,060 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 1,109,30 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 1,550,500 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 2,138.

1. Details of ruling;

A. Approval and Public Notice of Project - F Highway Private Investment Project (hereinafter “instant project”) - G project operator publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 4, 2012 - Busan Regional Construction and Management Office:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on August 22, 2013 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”): Each land and obstacles (hereinafter “each land and obstacles of this case”) indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” listed in attached Table 1, which are owned by the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiff C’s livestock industry (hereinafter “the livestock industry or livestock shed of this case”): Compensation for losses: The same amount as the amount indicated in the column for “adjudication of expropriation” listed in attached Table 1: The starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation: a future appraisal corporation, a central appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal made an objection (hereinafter “Objection”) on February 20, 2014 - The plaintiffs’ claim for the increase of compensation for each land and obstacles of this case shall be partially cited as indicated in the column for “Objection” in attached Table 1, and the plaintiffs A and B’ claim for the decline in the value of the remaining land and the claim for the closure of the business of the plaintiff C shall be dismissed, respectively. The claim for compensation for the omitted land of the plaintiff C shall be dismissed when the project operator confirmed the existence of omitted land and applied for an adjudication at the time of the failure of consultation after consultation with the compensation. The appraisal corporation: the land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, the land appraisal corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Objection”) (hereinafter “Objection”) / The ground for recognition has no dispute, Gap, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 (including each number), and Nos. 1 through 4, each of subparagraphs 1 through 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the result of the questioning of whether it is possible to grant permission to the livestock industry to the 1st Korea Appraisal Board and the neighboring Si/Gun/Gu, the Plaintiff C’s instant livestock shed shall be transferred.