logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단3824
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence against the accused.

Reasons

The Defendant is a person who operates “D” in the facts charged.

1. On August 26, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document in “D” for the operation of the Defendant of the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-si.

7. From around 10, around 10, a copy of the above contract in the F, which is a private document with respect to rights and obligations, was forged in order to open a mobile phone in its name without authority by securing a copy of the resident registration certificate in its name from F, and to open a mobile phone in its name without authority.

2. The Defendant: (a) opened a “G” mobile phone from the SK Telecom Agency located in Daegu City at the time of the day set forth in the preceding paragraph; (b) submitted the forged new service contract to an employee in charge of no knowledge of the fact that one copy of the new service contract was duly formed.

3. Around December 23, 2015, the Defendant, including computers, accessed the Internet using the aforementioned mobile phone number and passwords, inputs the F’s mobile phone number and password without authority, and purchased a culture merchandise coupon of KRW 50,000,000 in total over 71 times from that time to February 2, 2016, including purchases of KRW 1,486,090 in the same manner as indicated in the attached crime list.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above amount by inputting information into a computer or any other information processing device without authority.

Judgment

1. The Defendant’s assertion, as indicated in the facts charged, opened a “G” mobile phone in F’s name (hereinafter “the instant mobile phone”) and purchased cultural merchandise coupons using a mobile phone small payment service. However, since the opening of the instant mobile phone and the settlement of small amount amount was made with F’s consent, the Defendant’s assertion was neither forged nor falsified document nor information without authority.

arrow