A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From December 2, 2013, the Defendant received notification from the victim D (ma, 43 years of age) and marienda around May 2015, and led to the respect for the Hague.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Special Rape) around 17:30 on July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) established the victim’s trucking cargo onto the head of his/her trucking line; and (b) exceeded the victim’s clothes while standing the victim’s trucking in his/her trucking line; (c) exceeded the victim’s clothes while sounding the victim “to his/her body and clothes, if he/she saws the victim’s body and clothes.” (d) exceeded the part of the back seat of the cargo vehicle, which is a dangerous object in the back seat of the cargo vehicle, while standing the victim’s hand off the part of the cargo vehicle to the transparent tape in the back seat of the cargo vehicle; and (e) prevented the victim from suffering the victim’s hand.

The Defendant, while stating the inserted inserted in the cargo vehicle, which was continuously loaded at the cargo vehicle, read, “I will see the place to be filled up, I will see it.” If the victim was unable to resist the land, then the Defendant returned to the cargo vehicle and returned to the cargo vehicle, and had the victim sexual intercourse once with the victim.

In this respect, the defendant, who is a dangerous object, has been raped with the victim.

2. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant failed to comply with the Defendant’s call to the victim on or before July 23, 2015, stating that “the Defendant would hedging with the width,” and, if the Defendant was able to take advantage of it, he would have 10 million won away within three days. In short, the Defendant did not go to the extent that it would be hot at once without giving money, and then throw away oil to the door operated by the width, and then throw away it into the victim’s body, etc., and did not go to the victim’s withdrawal of the said money. However, the Defendant did not comply with the Defendant’s refusal to report to the police station, and did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning D;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The application of statutes governing the recording of July 23, 2015

1. Criminal facts;