logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.09 2016고단872
강제추행
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be announced publicly.

Reasons

1. On October 13, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim I (the victim I, the 20 years old), who was an employee of the above main shop, and prevented the Defendant from committing an indecent act against the victim, while the Defendant took a dispute over H and the food damage at “G main store” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. At around 02:50 on October 13, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by forcing the victim to commit an indecent act.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, it is difficult to recognize that the defendant intentionally committed an indecent act on the part of the victim from the above fact of recognition in light of the following circumstances, although the defendant was aware that he was a citizen of the right chest of the victim by hand as stated in the facts charged, and it is insufficient to recognize this in light of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

(1) At the time, the Defendant entered “G main points”, which is the place of the instant case, in a state of full intake (17,33 pages of investigation records) and friend and friend friend friend friend friend friend friend.

B. The Defendant entered the above main points and destroyed the goods of the said main points, and the Defendant took place with her friend with her friend and her friend, and the Defendant repeatedly told her friend to the friend and her friend, and she repeatedly told her friend to the friend, “the friend,” and her friended to “the friend,” and her friend to the h (the investigation record No. 15, 16 pages). At the time of her friend, the victim suffered from “the friend, even friend,” as her fri

Applicant is not sure that the defendant intentionally meets the victim's chest.

3. If so, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the court below held the Defendants not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and ordered the publication of the summary of the judgment pursuant to Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow