The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is not a narcotics handler.

On November 25, 2013, the Defendant opened up KRW 200,000 from E and F at the D Hospital located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and opened up approximately 0.1g of psychotropic drugs - psychotropic drugs - in the toilet of the said hospital to E, and sold 0.1g of philopon to F in the Mour where the trade name near the said D Hospital is unknown.

B. On November 25, 2013, the Defendant administered philophones by taking 0.1g of philophones into drinking water or by injecting them using a single-use injection device at the Mourel where the above trade name is unknown at around 18:30.

2. On November 25, 2013, the day of the instant case, the Defendant found the D Hospital hospitalized by E on November 25, 2013 and recognized the fact that E and F met.

However, there is only a final judgment in the F, E's prosecutor's office and this court's respective statements and the criminal case's case's E in relation to whether the defendant sold phiphones to the above E and F and whether he administered phiphones to the F and Ma.

(F) Each police interrogation protocol regarding F and E was adopted by this Court as evidence. However, even if F and E were to attend a court as a witness for the police interrogation protocol regarding accomplices, and each of the above interrogation protocol is admitted as evidence, it shall be deemed inadmissible as long as the defendant denies the contents of the protocol, and even if the admissibility exists, it is difficult to believe each of the statements on the grounds as follows. However, each statement made between F and E prosecutor's office and this court in the police room is inconsistent, and F was 10,000 won in return for Ph and the accused in the police room, and the defendant tried to use the penphonephone, and E was dead.