logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.04 2014가단5112890
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 27,800,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from September 2, 2011 to May 13, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that is entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), and the Defendant is an insurer who concluded an insurance contract with the B company that is the owner of the instant car for the instant car (hereinafter “the instant car”).

(hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). In the case of personal compensation I, the amount of the instant insurance contract is KRW 10 million under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (hereinafter “Personal Compensation Act”) and in the case of personal compensation, KRW 10 million.

B. At around 14:00 on November 15, 2010, C, a worker of B, did not confirm the presence of D, a worker of B, who is an employee of B, during the instant work of moving the product using the instant vehicle in the place of business of B, and caused an accident where C, a worker of B, did not confirm the presence of D (hereinafter “victim”), which is an employee of B, due to the latter.

C. As a result, the victim suffered injury, such as “the pelle 2, 3, 4 pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle, the upper right pelle pelle pelle pelle, the middle pelle pelle pelle, the upper right pelle pelle, the right pelle pelle pelle pelle, the right pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle, the right pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle pelle, and the nele gale damage

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

By September 1, 2011, the Plaintiff paid 10,329,680 won as medical care benefits, 25,585,060 won as temporary disability benefits, and 42,075,000 won as disability benefits pursuant to the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act applies to the accident caused by the operation of the instant truck for the owner, or not, the amount subscribed to the instant insurance contract Ⅰ.

arrow