1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Fact that there is no dispute over the basic facts [based for recognition], Gap evidence 1 through 6, 9 through 12 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), and Eul evidence 1;

A. From May 14, 2008 to December 8, 2008, the parties’ status network D (EE; hereinafter “the deceased”) had been treated for the removal of waste at Gangnam-gu Seoul District Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in Gangnam-gu (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). Around June 2009, the Defendant Hospital received treatment at Samsungnam Hospital and Seoul Metropolitan Hospital after receiving the diagnosis of waste cancer at the Defendant Hospital, etc., and was administered on the part of the deceased on November 10, 201, and the Defendant C is a medical specialist within the respiratory medicine of the Defendant Hospital.

B. On May 13, 2008, the Deceased’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s clinic’s hospital’s clinic’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s clinic’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s clinic’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s address. However, the hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s disease and clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s clinic’s hospital’s hospital’

3) The medical professionals at Defendant C, etc., including Defendant C, started sulbicisin and crithic colony for the deceased, on the ground of the empirical anti-biological therapy on the pulmonary waste acquired by the community for the following reasons: (a) the sulbiology of the blood test that was confirmed at the time of the outpatient treatment was increased to 26,560 (on the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e-mail 4,000 to 10,800); (b) the CRP value, which was the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e the e-

On the other hand, the defendant C is a diagnostic examination on the deceased, and the engine diameter is examined.