Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. On April 11, 2013, from around 12:30 to around 00:00 on April 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received chips equivalent to approximately KRW 6.30,00 Hong Kong ($ 90580,00 in Korean Won) from A from the second hotel casino in Maka; (b) carried out hosting, and (c) cut off the cards on both sides, with the card drawn on the display and the bank side; and (d) followed up the cards, the sum of the last place numbers is on the “9” by a person who is near the “9”, and a passenger chiscling in the so-called “bada” manner that would result in increasing the number of chips he/she sp.

B. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 12:30.

At the same place as in paragraph A, approximately KRW 4.5 million Hong Kong ($ 647 million in the Republic of Korea) was provided by A with chips equivalent to approximately KRW 4.5 million and engaged in the gambling as above.

C. On June 13, 2013, at around 12:30, the Defendant received approximately KRW 180,000 Hong Kong ( approximately KRW 258820,000 in Chinese Won) from a shipbuilding shop, from which it was impossible to know the name A’s instructions at the F Hotel casino located in Mcara, and carried out the bacambling as above.

The Defendant is from June 14, 2013 to June 15, 2013 to June 00, 2013.

At the same place as Paragraph A, approximately KRW 9 million Hong Kong ( approximately KRW 1.29,411 million in the Republic of Korea) was provided with chips equivalent to approximately KRW 1.29 billion in the Republic of Korea and carried out the gambling as above.

Accordingly, the defendant dyna gambling four times.

2. From April 11, 2013 to June 14, 2013, Defendant A provided a chip equivalent to approximately KRW 1,5930,00 Hong Kong ( approximately KRW 2.29,0560,000 in Chinese) to B who intends to stay in the country four times at each casino as referred to in paragraph (1) and (4) and aided and abetted B’s gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. A report on investigation (the sequence 45 in list of evidence);

1. Application of each immigration statute;

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 246 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and subparagraph A of a sentence elected;