The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, it is justifiable for the lower court to have determined that the Plaintiff’s injury or disease of this case does not constitute occupational accident after compiling the evidence adopted by the lower court.

There is no violation of the rules of evidence and the misapprehension of the legal principle on the scope of recognition of occupational accidents as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.