logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1986. 9. 9. 선고 86도1313 판결
[살인ㆍ살인미수ㆍ폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반ㆍ향토예비군설치법위반][공1986.10.15.(786),1339]
Main Issues

In the event that the fighting has caused the victim's knife to die by knife and knife, the examples recognizing the intention of murder.

Summary of Judgment

In a case where a fighting match and 32 cm in length and 20.5 cm in length, and the victim's left-hand side are continuously and continuously generated power, so if a knife knife and died by blood from a snife in the mouth of the knife at the site of the knife, there was a perception that the knife part is very important part of the body, so it would result in the brue death. Therefore, it should be deemed that there was a willful negligence in murder.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 250 of the Criminal Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Jeong-sung

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 86No381 delivered on May 28, 1986

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The forty-five days of detention days after the appeal shall be included in the original sentence.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel are examined.

If a fighting match and the kitchen knife knife in the kitchen (32% in length and 20.5% in length on the day) and "this knife knife" and "in this knife knife the left side of the victim by driving behind the victim, and the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife on the left side of the other victim, and then died by running the victim's knife knife knife with a knife, then there was no error of law in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the crime of murder and the crime of murder.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. In accordance with Article 57 of the Criminal Act and Article 24 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, 45 days of detention after the appeal shall be included in the original sentence. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Yoon Yoon-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow