logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고단9045
여신전문금융업법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized articles subject to seizure shall be confiscated in subparagraphs 1 through 18 above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the nationality of Malaysia, who enters the Republic of Korea on December 3, 2016 and currently stays in the Republic of Korea.

피고인은 휴대전화 채팅 앱인 위챗에서 'C' 라는 대화명을 사용하는 성명 불상 자로부터 알 수 없는 방법으로 위조된 피고인 명의의 신용카드 17 장을 교부 받은 다음 피고인이 한국에 입국하여 위조된 신용카드로 한국에서 고가의 물품을 구입해 오면 피고인이 구입한 물품 금액의 10%를 대가로 지급 받기로 하였다.

1. On December 3, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Financial Business Specializing in Credit and the Act and the Defendant was provided accommodation services, etc. equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 from an employee who could not know the victim’s name by presenting the forged credit card ( Samsung card: D) as if the Defendant was a credit card issued normally in the name of the Defendant, even if the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay accommodation expenses, in the case of lodging at a hotel in a lot, around 21:20, 201.

In addition, the Defendant received goods and services in an amount equivalent to KRW 3,774,00 from around 17:08 on December 3, 2016 to December 5, 200:39, as shown in the attached Table 1 of Crimes List 1, the Defendant used forged credit cards.

2. Around December 19:54, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Credit and attempted to commit fraud was provided by F located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the purchase price, presented the forged credit card (T: G) as if the Defendant was a credit card issued normally under the name of the Defendant, and then was provided by an employee whose victim’s name could not be known.

arrow