beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of running a car in the manner of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed).
On September 26, 2013, around 10:43, the Defendant was driving the said mick to the above intersection without obtaining a driver’s license at the front distance intersection in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, 128, by driving the said mick to the above intersection.
In such a case, since the width of the road that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle intends to enter is larger, there was a duty of care to prevent a collision accident with a vehicle that is driven by driving or stopping the motor vehicle in order to properly see the direction of the driving, the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and accurately manipulate the steering and the operation of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, when neglecting to do so, the victim D (the age of 32) who was driving on the left side of the defendant, did not discover the E-to-land driven by the victim D (the age of 32) and entered the intersection as it is, and caused the victim to dye the front part of the O-to-land by the defendant's occupational negligence.
The Defendant, due to such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the right shouldered flaps, etc., which requires treatment for about two weeks, and even if the Defendant destroyed the above flab to have an amount equivalent to KRW 2,045,00,00, the Defendant immediately stopped the above flab and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.
2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance of motor vehicles;
Nevertheless, the defendant from June 20, 2013 to the same year.
9. By the 26th day of the Incheon Day, the said Lone Star, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, was operated by the company.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;