Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged in this case are amended as stated in the facts charged to the extent that it is not likely to substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his defense right.

The Defendant is a person who, from January 2006 to January 201, 2013, had his wife manage the above F Burial and worked as a foundation at a dance shop located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building E-F from January 2013 to November 2015. The Defendant is a person who, from around November 2015, had his wife manage the above F Burial and worked as a foundation at a dance shop located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D et al.

G around November 21, 2016, the victim I and G entered into a premium contract with the victim to transfer the existing customer list and the facilities and equipment installed inside the F store to the victim KRW 136 million, and the victim completed the transfer of possession by giving and receiving KRW 20 million from the damaged person on November 30, 2016, and KRW 80 million from the damaged person on December 28, 2016, including giving and receiving KRW 20 million from the damaged person on December 30, 2016, and giving and receiving KRW 80 million from the damaged person on the same day, after notifying the water purifier company and the security company of the termination of the contract.

On December 31, 2016, the Defendant, using a security card held in the above store at around 00:02, and deleted the customer identification number, customer name, contact number, date of visit, and amount of money stored in the store computer at around 00:00, thereby impairing electronic records owned by the victim and impairing them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement by the witness J;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant or G by the prosecution;

1. The protocol of the police statement with regard to I (i.e., the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the aforementioned evidence as to the part that intrudes into a structure, namely, G, around November 21, 2016, the victim and G, and the victim, as indicated in the facts charged (hereinafter “instant store”).